Call Of Duty: World At War Review
By Cipherical onThe Bad: Lack of innovation of the setting (Seeing how most of the Call of Duty games are set in World War 2), Feels more like an expansion pack than a game.The Good: FREAKING FLAMETHROWERS (We all love flamethrowers, don't we?), Cooperative campaign with the ability to have four players (everything that has cooperative gameplay is awesome), FREAKING NAZI ZOMBIES (When that is added in with the cooperative gameplay, you got one heck of a game), brilliant voice acting (Kiefer Sutherland, that guy from that show 24, is one of the voice actors!), quite challenging (I kept dying, probably because I suck at First-Person Shooters), great gameplay (Shooting Nazis and Japanese dudes are fun), awesome and addictive multiplayer gameplay (I played for 4 hours yesterday!), exciting storyline (this games shows the not so pretty part of World War 2, but then again everything in war is not so pretty), magnificent multiplayer gameplay. The Conclusion: This game is awesome.
