Call Of Duty: World At War Review By Cipherical By Cipherical on - Updated Oct 15, 2011

The Bad: Lack of innovation of the setting (Seeing how most of the Call of Duty games are set in World War 2), Feels more like an expansion pack than a game. The Good: FREAKING FLAMETHROWERS (We all love flamethrowers, don't we?), Cooperative campaign with the ability to have four players (everything that has cooperative gameplay is awesome), FREAKING NAZI ZOMBIES (When that is added in with the cooperative gameplay, you got one heck of a game), brilliant voice acting (Kiefer Sutherland, that guy from that show 24, is one of the voice actors!), quite challenging (I kept dying, probably because I suck at First-Person Shooters), great gameplay (Shooting Nazis and Japanese dudes are fun), awesome and addictive multiplayer gameplay (I played for 4 hours yesterday!), exciting storyline (this games shows the not so pretty part of World War 2, but then again everything in war is not so pretty), magnificent multiplayer gameplay. The Conclusion: This game is awesome.

0 Reader Comments
In order to comment, sign in by:
Start Here
Write, Play, Earn! The game that let's you publish content like this
"Newbie SharedReviewer"

About The Author:

Off
L1
Cipherical
author

Cipherical

"I've been a player on SharedReviews since January 2009, I've published 5 articles, and I've become a top 18155 author in achievements."

Gaming Expertise:
1.0
Overall Rating:
4.6
Review Type: Product Review What's Being Reviewed:
Treyarch Call of Duty: World At War
Tagged:
X 5
X 17