Kill a Tree Support Starving Paparazzi! Buy Star

If you dont like trees or if you just want to support the merciless paparazzi, buy Star!

You might be disappointed to hear that gone are the days that these tireless reporters hunt down stories of alien invasions, human babies born to gorillas and other interesting newsworthy articles but in their place is more! More! MORE! Stories of harried and hassled entertainers!

As a subscriber to this great magazine you will fully support the invasion of privacy of all of your favorite, and least favorite, celebrities!

I was the very lucky recipient of a full years subscription of this very special rag mag. I am not sure that it makes me any more happy to be killing trees on someone elses dime but I certainly would not spend my own on this. Well, what word could I possible call it that would convey the atrocity that is sold as news?

The articles in the magazine are poorly written, for the most part, with some being overly invasive and/or downright rude and ridiculing. While I am interested in how the other half lives, I am not interested in supporting sneak shots of people in their private yards or mobs of people following individuals while they are trying to shop, enjoy a quiet dinner or a pleasant day or night out.

Does Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie really needthe parenting advice given by Star Magazine? If they want to allow their children to eat (you might want to look away for this one!) pizza and chocolate for breakfast, is it anyones right to publicly criticize the family that they most likely do not know? Is pizza for breakfast all that unusual anyway? Around these parts it is a college staple

Is anyone really interested in the article of how it appears that Tom Cruise may be wearing specially made shoes that could possibly add an inch to his height? This is an actual article! Since when did speculation from a photobecome news?

I am also appalled that Star sees it fit to print photos of Lindsey Lohan and another woman which were taken from lord knows how far away (they are blurry from being blown up far beyond what they should be and with those telescoping lenses someone worked really hard to invade this young womans privacy) in order to show that their assumptions regarding her sexuality are more than likely true. Is it really a big deal what her sexuality is anyway? The article and pictures seem ruthless and cruel to me

To be fair, there are some movie and television reviews that arent half bad. They also have shopping and beauty tips that are adequate to good but not anything that I couldnt read in a better quality magazine.

Overall this magazine is trashy and certainly not worth the life of a tree.

Do our country a favor save a tree and put a paparazzo out of work Dont buy Star!